PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSK vs. BITO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and BITO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

CLSK vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-41.26%
49.20%
CLSK
BITO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSK:

0.18

BITO:

1.97

Sortino Ratio

CLSK:

1.24

BITO:

2.58

Omega Ratio

CLSK:

1.13

BITO:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

CLSK:

0.23

BITO:

2.39

Martin Ratio

CLSK:

0.54

BITO:

8.41

Ulcer Index

CLSK:

39.12%

BITO:

13.45%

Daily Std Dev

CLSK:

115.73%

BITO:

57.35%

Max Drawdown

CLSK:

-98.56%

BITO:

-77.86%

Current Drawdown

CLSK:

-84.56%

BITO:

-7.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's 6.32% return.


CLSK

YTD

21.61%

1M

-10.26%

6M

-41.27%

1Y

46.41%

5Y*

18.10%

10Y*

N/A

BITO

YTD

6.32%

1M

-6.72%

6M

49.21%

1Y

114.59%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. BITO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BITO is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BITO is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BITO is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BITO is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BITO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BITO is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSK vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.331.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.442.58
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.542.39
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.000.968.41
CLSK
BITO

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.33
1.97
CLSK
BITO

Dividends

CLSK vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

CLSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.92%.


TTM2024202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
57.92%61.58%15.14%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and BITO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-52.14%
-7.51%
CLSK
BITO

Volatility

CLSK vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 25.41% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 16.14%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
25.41%
16.14%
CLSK
BITO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab