PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSE vs. GBTC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and GBTC is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CLSE vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.95%
37.14%
CLSE
GBTC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSE:

2.74

GBTC:

2.05

Sortino Ratio

CLSE:

3.69

GBTC:

2.59

Omega Ratio

CLSE:

1.47

GBTC:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

CLSE:

5.04

GBTC:

3.09

Martin Ratio

CLSE:

18.13

GBTC:

7.66

Ulcer Index

CLSE:

2.06%

GBTC:

15.52%

Daily Std Dev

CLSE:

13.63%

GBTC:

57.99%

Max Drawdown

CLSE:

-14.28%

GBTC:

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

CLSE:

-0.40%

GBTC:

-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than GBTC's 12.20% return.


CLSE

YTD

3.88%

1M

2.81%

6M

12.96%

1Y

34.99%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GBTC

YTD

12.20%

1M

8.60%

6M

37.14%

1Y

124.40%

5Y*

54.45%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSE vs. GBTC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSE is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSE is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSE is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBTC is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBTC is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBTC is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBTC is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBTC is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBTC is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSE vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.742.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.692.59
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.471.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.005.043.39
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 18.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.137.66
CLSE
GBTC

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and GBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.74
2.05
CLSE
GBTC

Dividends

CLSE vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.89%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and GBTC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.40%
-1.96%
CLSE
GBTC

Volatility

CLSE vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is 5.03%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC) has a volatility of 15.80%. This indicates that CLSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.03%
15.80%
CLSE
GBTC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab