PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSE vs. FIW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CLSEFIW
YTD Return21.84%12.59%
1Y Return39.21%27.77%
Sharpe Ratio3.481.93
Daily Std Dev11.37%15.07%
Max Drawdown-14.28%-52.75%
Current Drawdown-0.86%-0.55%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CLSE and FIW is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLSE vs. FIW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 21.84% return, which is significantly higher than FIW's 12.59% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
41.40%
34.02%
CLSE
FIW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

First Trust Water ETF

CLSE vs. FIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FIW's 0.54% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for FIW: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSE vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 3.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 5.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSE, currently valued at 27.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0027.77
FIW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FIW, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FIW, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FIW, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FIW, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FIW, currently valued at 5.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.75

CLSE vs. FIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the FIW Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLSE and FIW.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.48
1.93
CLSE
FIW

Dividends

CLSE vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than FIW's 0.60% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.99%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.60%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%0.75%0.62%

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, smaller than the maximum FIW drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and FIW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.86%
-0.55%
CLSE
FIW

Volatility

CLSE vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to First Trust Water ETF (FIW) at 3.59%. This indicates that CLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.86%
3.59%
CLSE
FIW