PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLS vs. IBP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLSIBP
YTD Return63.93%27.72%
1Y Return334.39%105.15%
3Y Return (Ann)78.99%25.80%
5Y Return (Ann)47.02%34.94%
10Y Return (Ann)15.59%34.00%
Sharpe Ratio7.412.86
Daily Std Dev45.90%37.75%
Max Drawdown-96.93%-61.75%
Current Drawdown-43.20%-10.73%

Fundamentals


CLSIBP
Market Cap$5.78B$6.65B
EPS$2.68$8.83
PE Ratio18.1026.46
PEG Ratio19.421.20
Revenue (TTM)$8.33B$2.81B
Gross Profit (TTM)$640.30M$827.78M
EBITDA (TTM)$572.40M$479.40M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CLS and IBP is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLS vs. IBP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 63.93% return, which is significantly higher than IBP's 27.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed IBP with an annualized return of 15.59%, while IBP has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
409.55%
1,819.66%
CLS
IBP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celestica Inc.

Installed Building Products, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLS vs. IBP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLS, currently valued at 7.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.007.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLS, currently valued at 6.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.006.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLS, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLS, currently valued at 14.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0014.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLS, currently valued at 67.67, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0067.67
IBP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBP, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBP, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IBP, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBP, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IBP, currently valued at 9.80, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.80

CLS vs. IBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 7.41, which is higher than the IBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CLS and IBP.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.006.007.008.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.41
2.86
CLS
IBP

Dividends

CLS vs. IBP - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


TTM202320222021
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
1.27%1.21%2.51%0.85%

Drawdowns

CLS vs. IBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than IBP's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and IBP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.89%
-10.73%
CLS
IBP

Volatility

CLS vs. IBP - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) at 12.04%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.46%
12.04%
CLS
IBP

Financials

CLS vs. IBP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Installed Building Products, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items