CLS vs. IBP

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 204.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBP's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed IBP with an annualized return of 23.36%, while IBP has yielded a comparatively higher 30.08% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is higher than the IBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and IBP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than IBP's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and IBP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 12.51%, while Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) has a volatility of 13.62%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Installed Building Products, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.