PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLPAX vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLPAX and VGT is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

CLPAX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.19%
7.90%
CLPAX
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLPAX:

1.12

VGT:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

CLPAX:

1.62

VGT:

1.95

Omega Ratio

CLPAX:

1.20

VGT:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

CLPAX:

1.28

VGT:

2.08

Martin Ratio

CLPAX:

4.59

VGT:

7.34

Ulcer Index

CLPAX:

3.35%

VGT:

4.31%

Daily Std Dev

CLPAX:

13.73%

VGT:

21.72%

Max Drawdown

CLPAX:

-36.85%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

CLPAX:

-1.98%

VGT:

-3.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 1.47%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.92% annualized return.


CLPAX

YTD

2.37%

1M

1.06%

6M

5.85%

1Y

12.63%

5Y*

4.07%

10Y*

1.47%

VGT

YTD

0.91%

1M

-0.66%

6M

7.70%

1Y

26.38%

5Y*

20.29%

10Y*

20.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLPAX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.


CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for CLPAX: current value at 1.74% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.74%
Expense ratio chart for VGT: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLPAX vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLPAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLPAX is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLPAX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLPAX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLPAX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLPAX is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLPAX is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLPAX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.121.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.621.95
The chart of Omega ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.201.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.282.08
The chart of Martin ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 4.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.597.34
CLPAX
VGT

The current CLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLPAX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.12
1.46
CLPAX
VGT

Dividends

CLPAX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

CLPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.08%0.29%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.59%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

CLPAX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -36.85%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.98%
-3.05%
CLPAX
VGT

Volatility

CLPAX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) is 5.66%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that CLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.66%
6.85%
CLPAX
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab