CLPAX vs. VGT

In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 3.43%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.78% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLPAX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and VGT.

The current volatility for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) is 4.78%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that CLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.