PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLPAX vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLPAX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.21%
8.52%
CLPAX
QYLD

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPAX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 0.88%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


CLPAX

YTD

8.44%

1M

-1.17%

6M

5.82%

1Y

13.77%

5Y (annualized)

2.82%

10Y (annualized)

0.88%

QYLD

YTD

15.14%

1M

0.18%

6M

8.78%

1Y

19.13%

5Y (annualized)

7.00%

10Y (annualized)

8.17%

Key characteristics


CLPAXQYLD
Sharpe Ratio1.081.87
Sortino Ratio1.552.54
Omega Ratio1.191.45
Calmar Ratio0.952.49
Martin Ratio4.2613.64
Ulcer Index3.21%1.42%
Daily Std Dev12.64%10.34%
Max Drawdown-36.85%-24.89%
Current Drawdown-3.34%-2.53%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLPAX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for CLPAX: current value at 1.74% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.74%
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CLPAX and QYLD is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLPAX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.081.87
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.552.54
The chart of Omega ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.191.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.952.49
The chart of Martin ratio for CLPAX, currently valued at 4.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.2613.64
CLPAX
QYLD

The current CLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLPAX and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.08
1.87
CLPAX
QYLD

Dividends

CLPAX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

CLPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.08%0.29%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.53%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

CLPAX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -36.85%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.34%
-2.53%
CLPAX
QYLD

Volatility

CLPAX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 3.56%. This indicates that CLPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.25%
3.56%
CLPAX
QYLD