PortfoliosLab logo
CLOZ vs. BSJQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and BSJQ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
27.38%
17.00%
CLOZ
BSJQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLOZ:

1.42

BSJQ:

2.03

Sortino Ratio

CLOZ:

1.86

BSJQ:

2.88

Omega Ratio

CLOZ:

1.52

BSJQ:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

CLOZ:

1.23

BSJQ:

2.81

Martin Ratio

CLOZ:

5.98

BSJQ:

17.83

Ulcer Index

CLOZ:

1.09%

BSJQ:

0.42%

Daily Std Dev

CLOZ:

4.62%

BSJQ:

3.68%

Max Drawdown

CLOZ:

-5.33%

BSJQ:

-24.15%

Current Drawdown

CLOZ:

-2.35%

BSJQ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than BSJQ's 1.68% return.


CLOZ

YTD

-0.90%

1M

-0.59%

6M

1.82%

1Y

6.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BSJQ

YTD

1.68%

1M

0.42%

6M

2.60%

1Y

7.81%

5Y*

6.35%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CLOZ: 0.50%
Expense ratio chart for BSJQ: current value is 0.42%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BSJQ: 0.42%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLOZ vs. BSJQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSJQ is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSJQ is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSJQ is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSJQ is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSJQ is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSJQ is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CLOZ: 1.42
BSJQ: 2.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CLOZ: 1.86
BSJQ: 2.88
The chart of Omega ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CLOZ: 1.52
BSJQ: 1.48
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CLOZ: 1.23
BSJQ: 2.81
The chart of Martin ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 5.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CLOZ: 5.98
BSJQ: 17.83

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the BSJQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and BSJQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.007.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.42
2.03
CLOZ
BSJQ

Dividends

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than BSJQ's 6.53% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.80%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
6.53%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%5.53%2.39%

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.33%, smaller than the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and BSJQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.35%
0
CLOZ
BSJQ

Volatility

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 2.87%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.31%
2.87%
CLOZ
BSJQ