PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOZ vs. BSJQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
-1.42%5.99%11.85%14.92%
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.66%6.59%7.49%7.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than BSJQ's 0.66% return.


CLOZ

1D
0.51%
1M
0.79%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
10Y*

BSJQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.78%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
7.08%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLOZ vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOZBSJQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.85

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

2.63

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.59

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.39

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.89

17.12

-13.23

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BSJQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and BSJQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOZBSJQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.85

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

0.54

+2.01

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and BSJQ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than BSJQ's 5.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
7.93%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.95%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and BSJQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOZBSJQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-24.13%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-2.52%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

0.00%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-2.22%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.35%

+0.88%

Volatility

CLOZ vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.59%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOZBSJQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.59%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

0.94%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.50%

3.21%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

5.74%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

8.54%

-4.71%