CLOU vs. MSFT
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned -0.66%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for MSFT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CLOU vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 14.89%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.66%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- -11.24%
- 6M
- -10.15%
- 1Y
- -6.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
CLOU vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 9.15% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -11.24% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 31.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and MSFT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CLOU and MSFT has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
MSFT
CLOU vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | -0.28 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | -0.21 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | -0.21 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | -0.44 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | -0.28 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.46 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -69.38% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -33.91% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -33.91% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -37.15% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.83% | -20.67% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -21.78% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 15.95% | -4.93% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.85% | 9.95% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.82% | 22.34% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 25.12% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 26.63% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 27.04% | +3.75% |
Dividends
CLOU vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and MSFT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
CLOU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer