PortfoliosLab logo
CLOB vs. JPST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and JPST is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CLOB vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.60%
2.69%
CLOB
JPST

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CLOB:

8.27%

JPST:

0.61%

Max Drawdown

CLOB:

-5.54%

JPST:

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

CLOB:

-0.69%

JPST:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than JPST's 1.71% return.


CLOB

YTD

0.77%

1M

1.91%

6M

2.34%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

JPST

YTD

1.71%

1M

0.48%

6M

2.49%

1Y

5.41%

5Y*

3.07%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOB vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLOB vs. JPST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB

JPST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JPST is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JPST is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JPST is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JPST is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JPST is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JPST is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLOB vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CLOB vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than JPST's 4.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
3.76%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.91%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and JPST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.69%
0
CLOB
JPST

Volatility

CLOB vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.27%. This indicates that CLOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.64%
0.27%
CLOB
JPST