PortfoliosLab logo
CLOA vs. IBHE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLOA and IBHE is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CLOA vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CLOA:

1.02%

IBHE:

1.75%

Max Drawdown

CLOA:

-0.04%

IBHE:

-26.92%

Current Drawdown

CLOA:

-0.02%

IBHE:

0.00%

Returns By Period


CLOA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IBHE

YTD

1.75%

1M

0.65%

6M

2.56%

1Y

6.16%

5Y*

6.77%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOA vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLOA vs. IBHE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBHE is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBHE is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBHE is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBHE is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBHE is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBHE is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLOA vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CLOA vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison

CLOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than IBHE's 6.33% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
6.33%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%

Drawdowns

CLOA vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOA drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum IBHE drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOA and IBHE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CLOA vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...