PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNN vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clene Inc. (CLNN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLNN
Clene Inc.
-16.01%10.55%-10.49%-70.34%-75.61%-54.50%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
-13.06%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLNN achieves a -16.01% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.


CLNN

1D
2.28%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-16.01%
6M
-18.17%
1Y
60.06%
3Y*
-39.80%
5Y*
-54.75%
10Y*

SWLGX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-8.63%
YTD
-13.06%
6M
-12.07%
1Y
14.45%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNN vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNN
CLNN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CLNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLNN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CLNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLNN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clene Inc. (CLNN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLNNSWLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.10

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

0.72

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.50

2.51

-1.01

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLNN and SWLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNNSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

0.56

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.68

-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between CLNN and SWLGX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

CLNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CLNN
Clene Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.52%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%

Drawdowns

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNN drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNN and SWLGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNNSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-32.69%

-66.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.64%

-16.16%

-52.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.13%

-32.69%

-66.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.49%

-16.16%

-82.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.24%

-7.13%

-77.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.36%

4.62%

+30.74%

Volatility

CLNN vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Clene Inc. (CLNN) has a higher volatility of 27.58% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that CLNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLNNSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.58%

5.38%

+22.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.99%

11.82%

+74.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.84%

22.31%

+98.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.67%

21.47%

+81.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.67%

22.78%

+89.89%