CLMB vs. KMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLMB or KMB.
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and KMB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CLMB vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLMB:
1.97
KMB:
0.04
CLMB:
2.75
KMB:
0.22
CLMB:
1.32
KMB:
1.03
CLMB:
2.93
KMB:
0.09
CLMB:
8.27
KMB:
0.20
CLMB:
10.90%
KMB:
6.64%
CLMB:
49.26%
KMB:
19.13%
CLMB:
-89.12%
KMB:
-39.69%
CLMB:
-23.17%
KMB:
-9.74%
Fundamentals
CLMB:
$469.03M
KMB:
$43.43B
CLMB:
$4.27
KMB:
$7.34
CLMB:
23.87
KMB:
17.83
CLMB:
1.56
KMB:
5.74
CLMB:
0.91
KMB:
2.20
CLMB:
4.88
KMB:
39.28
CLMB:
$511.23M
KMB:
$19.75B
CLMB:
$96.59M
KMB:
$7.00B
CLMB:
$35.29M
KMB:
$3.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -15.21% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 23.55%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.41% annualized return.
CLMB
-15.21%
0.26%
-9.73%
95.83%
46.61%
23.55%
KMB
2.44%
-1.55%
1.36%
0.82%
2.72%
5.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLMB vs. KMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLMB
KMB
CLMB vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLMB vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than KMB's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.63% | 0.54% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% | 3.95% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 3.70% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and KMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLMB vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 6.55%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLMB vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLMB vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 23.40M and revenue of 138.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 4.78M and revenue of 138.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 769.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.68M and revenue of 138.04M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.