CLMB vs. KMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB).
Performance
CLMB vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLMB vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -22.87% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -3.20% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Fundamentals
CLMB:
$90.02M
KMB:
$32.13B
CLMB:
$4.71
KMB:
$6.06
CLMB:
4.21
KMB:
15.91
CLMB:
0.18
KMB:
2.75
CLMB:
0.14
KMB:
1.87
CLMB:
0.77
KMB:
19.71
CLMB:
$652.52M
KMB:
$17.22B
CLMB:
$105.27M
KMB:
$6.13B
CLMB:
$36.71M
KMB:
$3.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -22.87% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 20.05%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.
CLMB
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -16.27%
- YTD
- -22.87%
- 6M
- -41.11%
- 1Y
- -28.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 27.47%
- 10Y*
- 20.05%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -29.15%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLMB vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
CLMB
KMB
CLMB vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLMB | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | -1.17 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | -1.49 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.78 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.92 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.50 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLMB | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | -1.17 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | -0.16 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.00 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.46 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and KMB is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CLMB vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than KMB's 5.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.25% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and KMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMB | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.12% | -36.97% | -52.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -30.70% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.94% | -31.73% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | -31.73% | -17.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.63% | -31.64% | -12.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.18% | -8.74% | -23.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.88% | 18.99% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CLMB vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 6.74%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLMB | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 6.74% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.57% | 21.02% | +12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 24.96% | +21.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.19% | 19.79% | +24.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 20.83% | +19.03% |
Financials
CLMB vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLMB vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 29.83M and revenue of 193.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 9.52M and revenue of 193.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 507.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 6.98M and revenue of 193.85M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 499.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.