PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLLS vs. STRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLLS vs. STRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLLS achieves a -36.16% return, which is significantly lower than STRS's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CLLS has underperformed STRS with an annualized return of -21.00%, while STRS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.65% annualized return.


CLLS

1D
-8.58%
1M
-16.49%
YTD
-36.16%
6M
-33.69%
1Y
111.64%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
-26.64%
10Y*
-21.00%

STRS

1D
-2.93%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
15.05%
6M
21.91%
1Y
46.42%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLLS vs. STRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLLS
Cellectis S.A.
-36.16%168.89%-41.56%46.67%-74.14%-69.99%58.06%2.82%-42.88%71.98%
STRS
Stratus Properties Inc.
15.05%16.47%-28.07%49.61%-39.37%43.41%-17.69%29.19%-19.26%-5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CLLS and STRS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2015

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLLS:

$310.63M

STRS:

$224.09M

EPS

CLLS:

-$0.67

STRS:

$4.02

PS Ratio

CLLS:

4.56

STRS:

7.86

PB Ratio

CLLS:

5.18

STRS:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLLS:

$68.09M

STRS:

$28.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLLS:

$54.51M

STRS:

-$14.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLLS:

-$55.66M

STRS:

$31.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cellectis S.A.

Stratus Properties Inc.

Often compared with CLLS:
CLLS vs. PNC
Often compared with STRS:
STRS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

CLLS vs. STRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLLS
CLLS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CLLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CLLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

STRS
STRS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
STRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
STRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLLS vs. STRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLLSSTRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.89

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

4.98

+0.33

CLLS vs. STRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the STRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLLS and STRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLLSSTRSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.10

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.24

0.09

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.12

-0.36

Drawdowns

CLLS vs. STRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLLS drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than STRS's maximum drawdown of -87.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLLS and STRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLLSSTRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.96%

-87.61%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.43%

-24.64%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.61%

-48.79%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.03%

-61.14%

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.48%

-61.93%

-35.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.52%

-29.98%

-63.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.92%

-37.23%

-31.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.09%

9.35%

+11.74%

Volatility

CLLS vs. STRS - Volatility Comparison

Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) at 4.90%. This indicates that CLLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLLSSTRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.37%

4.90%

+10.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.20%

27.10%

+23.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.10%

48.19%

+45.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.65%

47.86%

+61.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.11%

51.59%

+37.52%

Dividends

CLLS vs. STRS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLLS nor STRS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLLS
Cellectis S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STRS
Stratus Properties Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.37%

Financials

CLLS vs. STRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cellectis S.A. and Stratus Properties Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
5.80M
3.79M
(CLLS) Total Revenue
(STRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLLS and STRS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLLS has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to STRS (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLLS dropped -97.96% vs STRS's -87.61%.

CLLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLLS and STRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer