CLLS vs. STRS

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CLLS (Cellectis S.A.) and STRS (Stratus Properties Inc.) are both stocks. CLLS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while STRS operates in Real Estate - Diversified (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, CLLS returned -20.24%/yr vs 5.10%/yr for STRS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLLS vs. STRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLLS achieves a -45.66% return, which is significantly lower than STRS's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CLLS has underperformed STRS with an annualized return of -20.24%, while STRS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.10% annualized return.

CLLS

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -14.61%
• 6M: -35.38%
• YTD: -45.66%
• 1Y: 36.27%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: -28.58%
• 10Y*: -20.24%

STRS

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -10.50%
• 6M: -1.38%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 1Y: 37.27%
• 3Y*: -0.98%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 5.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLLS vs. STRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLLS Cellectis S.A.	-45.66%	168.89%	-41.56%	46.67%	-74.14%	-69.99%	58.06%	2.82%	-42.88%	71.98%
STRS Stratus Properties Inc.	6.04%	16.47%	-28.07%	49.61%	-39.37%	43.41%	-17.69%	29.19%	-19.26%	-5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CLLS and STRS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015	0.13

The correlation between CLLS and STRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLLS : $264.10M STRS : $165.40M
EPS CLLS : -$0.67 STRS : $4.04
PS Ratio CLLS : 3.88 STRS : 5.84
PB Ratio CLLS : 4.41 STRS : 0.79
Total Revenue (TTM) CLLS : $68.09M STRS : $28.66M
Gross Profit (TTM) CLLS : $54.51M STRS : -$14.38M
EBITDA (TTM) CLLS : -$55.66M STRS : $31.72M

Return for Risk

CLLS vs. STRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLLS

CLLS Risk / Return Rank: 62
CLLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CLLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CLLS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CLLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CLLS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

STRS

STRS Risk / Return Rank: 73
STRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
STRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
STRS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
STRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
STRS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLLS vs. STRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLLS	STRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	0.87	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.59	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	1.72	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.40	4.22	-2.81

CLLS vs. STRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the STRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLLS and STRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLLS vs. STRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLLS drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than STRS's maximum drawdown of -87.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLLS and STRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLLS	STRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.96%	-87.61%	-10.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.84%	-21.71%	-29.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.61%	-48.79%	-18.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.67%	-61.14%	-32.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.48%	-61.93%	-35.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.48%	-35.46%	-59.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.23%	-37.20%	-32.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.95%	9.06%	+16.89%

Volatility

CLLS vs. STRS - Volatility Comparison

Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) has a higher volatility of 18.76% compared to Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) at 7.53%. This indicates that CLLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLLS	STRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.76%	7.53%	+11.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.66%	24.08%	+22.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.50%	43.25%	+45.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.72%	47.89%	+61.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.20%	51.21%	+37.99%

Dividends

CLLS vs. STRS - Dividend Comparison

CLLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLLS Cellectis S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STRS Stratus Properties Inc.	24.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	24.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.37%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLLS and STRS in my portfolio?

CLLS and STRS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLLS or STRS?

CLLS has higher volatility (18.76%) compared to STRS (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLLS dropped -97.96% vs STRS's -87.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.