CLIX vs. IXN
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN).
CLIX and IXN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLIX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2017. IXN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. Both CLIX and IXN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLIX or IXN.
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and IXN is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
CLIX vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLIX:
0.76
IXN:
0.12
CLIX:
1.13
IXN:
0.31
CLIX:
1.14
IXN:
1.04
CLIX:
0.24
IXN:
0.17
CLIX:
3.26
IXN:
0.44
CLIX:
4.47%
IXN:
6.53%
CLIX:
19.26%
IXN:
24.10%
CLIX:
-73.21%
IXN:
-55.67%
CLIX:
-54.80%
IXN:
-13.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than IXN's -9.32% return.
CLIX
1.61%
-3.06%
-2.70%
14.85%
-2.92%
N/A
IXN
-9.32%
-3.76%
-5.13%
3.67%
22.28%
17.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLIX vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLIX vs. IXN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLIX
IXN
CLIX vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLIX vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than IXN's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than IXN's maximum drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and IXN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLIX vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is NaN%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that CLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with CLIX or IXN
Recent discussions
building ETF screener
Marcus Crahan
technical support
Marcus Crahan
Return and Dividend Calculation
Farshad