PortfoliosLab logo
CLIA vs. GABF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLIA and GABF is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CLIA vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Veridien Climate Action ETF (CLIA) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


CLIA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GABF

YTD

-0.67%

1M

5.33%

6M

-6.60%

1Y

23.94%

3Y*

23.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Veridien Climate Action ETF

CLIA vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLIA vs. GABF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLIA is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLIA is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLIA is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLIA is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLIA is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLIA is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GABF is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GABF is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GABF is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GABF is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLIA vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Veridien Climate Action ETF (CLIA) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CLIA vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

CLIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.


TTM202420232022
CLIA
Veridien Climate Action ETF
0.00%0.00%0.39%0.00%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
4.22%4.19%4.95%1.31%

Drawdowns

CLIA vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CLIA vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...