CLF vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLF or SCHG.
Performance
CLF vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -45.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 30.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 2.91%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
CLF
-45.94%
-20.80%
-36.95%
-35.02%
8.71%
2.91%
SCHG
30.50%
2.16%
14.17%
37.63%
19.96%
16.38%
Key characteristics
| CLF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.79 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.11 | 2.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.87 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.40 | 3.08 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.21 | 12.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 29.10% | 3.11% |
| Daily Std Dev | 44.64% | 17.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.78% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -88.75% | -3.02% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and SCHG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLF vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLF vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 2.29% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLF vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 25.62% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.73%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.