CLF vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
CLF vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLF vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -37.73% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -37.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.31%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
CLF
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- -27.46%
- YTD
- -37.73%
- 6M
- -33.52%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- -23.30%
- 5Y*
- -15.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
CLF
SCHG
CLF vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLF | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.76 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 1.24 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 1.09 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 3.71 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLF | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.76 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.57 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.79 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.79 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and SCHG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLF vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.78% | -34.59% | -64.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.67% | -16.41% | -35.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.37% | -34.59% | -47.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.37% | -34.59% | -47.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.57% | -12.51% | -79.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.42% | -5.22% | -42.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 4.84% | +16.93% |
Volatility
CLF vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLF | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.52% | 6.77% | +7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.61% | 12.54% | +41.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.95% | 22.45% | +54.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.31% | 22.31% | +37.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.80% | 21.51% | +43.29% |