PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLF vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLF and GLDM is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

CLF vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
16.13%
106.47%
CLF
GLDM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLF:

-1.23

GLDM:

1.96

Sortino Ratio

CLF:

-2.14

GLDM:

2.58

Omega Ratio

CLF:

0.76

GLDM:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

CLF:

-0.61

GLDM:

3.60

Martin Ratio

CLF:

-1.67

GLDM:

10.29

Ulcer Index

CLF:

32.88%

GLDM:

2.83%

Daily Std Dev

CLF:

44.81%

GLDM:

14.88%

Max Drawdown

CLF:

-98.78%

GLDM:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

CLF:

-90.45%

GLDM:

-5.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -54.06% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 27.06% return.


CLF

YTD

-54.06%

1M

-19.55%

6M

-36.62%

1Y

-55.10%

5Y*

3.13%

10Y*

4.89%

GLDM

YTD

27.06%

1M

-0.97%

6M

12.95%

1Y

28.19%

5Y*

12.04%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLF vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLF, currently valued at -1.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-1.231.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLF, currently valued at -2.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-2.142.58
The chart of Omega ratio for CLF, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.761.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.773.60
The chart of Martin ratio for CLF, currently valued at -1.67, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.6710.29
CLF
GLDM

The current CLF Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLF and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.23
1.96
CLF
GLDM

Dividends

CLF vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLF nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.40%2.29%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLF vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-71.64%
-5.88%
CLF
GLDM

Volatility

CLF vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.16%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.95%
5.16%
CLF
GLDM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab