PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLDN.L vs. ATST.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLDN.LATST.L
YTD Return-3.51%15.92%
1Y Return-0.48%23.74%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.13%8.32%
5Y Return (Ann)5.30%11.71%
10Y Return (Ann)6.93%12.56%
Sharpe Ratio-0.111.97
Sortino Ratio-0.042.66
Omega Ratio1.001.36
Calmar Ratio-0.102.95
Martin Ratio-0.318.04
Ulcer Index6.15%2.95%
Daily Std Dev17.73%12.01%
Max Drawdown-49.91%-41.44%
Current Drawdown-13.25%0.00%

Fundamentals


CLDN.LATST.L
Market Cap£1.84B£3.41B
EPS£3.69£2.12
PE Ratio9.165.73
Total Revenue (TTM)£114.20M£652.76M
Gross Profit (TTM)£99.40M£635.13M
EBITDA (TTM)£101.05M£295.69M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CLDN.L and ATST.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLDN.L achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than ATST.L's 15.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDN.L has underperformed ATST.L with an annualized return of 6.93%, while ATST.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.52%
3.23%
CLDN.L
ATST.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caledonia Investments (CLDN.L) and Alliance Trust plc (ATST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLDN.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDN.L, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDN.L, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDN.L, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDN.L, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDN.L, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.01
ATST.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 3.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 11.51, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.51

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the ATST.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDN.L and ATST.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.00
2.02
CLDN.L
ATST.L

Dividends

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Dividend Comparison

CLDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than ATST.L's 2.04% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLDN.L
Caledonia Investments
2.08%1.92%6.66%1.56%2.14%1.91%2.04%5.51%2.05%2.15%0.02%2.51%
ATST.L
Alliance Trust plc
2.04%2.24%2.51%1.63%1.59%1.65%1.48%1.76%2.02%1.76%0.02%1.66%

Drawdowns

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDN.L drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, which is greater than ATST.L's maximum drawdown of -41.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDN.L and ATST.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.14%
0
CLDN.L
ATST.L

Volatility

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Volatility Comparison

Caledonia Investments (CLDN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Alliance Trust plc (ATST.L) at 3.17%. This indicates that CLDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.95%
3.17%
CLDN.L
ATST.L

Financials

CLDN.L vs. ATST.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caledonia Investments and Alliance Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items