CL=F vs. GOLD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD).

Performance

CL=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CL=F vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CL=F Crude Oil WTI	72.26%	-2.08%
GOLD Gold.com, Inc	23.21%	14.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 72.26% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 23.21% return.

CL=F

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: 38.86%
• YTD: 72.26%
• 6M: 60.10%
• 1Y: 38.92%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

GOLD

• 1D: 4.32%
• 1M: -26.47%
• YTD: 23.21%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CL=F vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL=F

CL=F Risk / Return Rank: 29
CL=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CL=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CL=F Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CL=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CL=F Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CL=F	GOLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CL=F	GOLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	2.90	-2.83

Correlation

The correlation between CL=F and GOLD is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -92.04%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and GOLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CL=F	GOLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.04%	-40.58%	-51.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.92%	-34.59%	+2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.84%	-9.57%	-31.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CL=F	GOLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.12%	64.84%	-23.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.54%	64.84%	-28.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.71%	64.84%	-16.13%