PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CL=F vs. GOLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CL=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 67.54% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 16.19% return.


CL=F

1D
2.60%
1M
-9.60%
YTD
67.54%
6M
63.19%
1Y
51.71%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
7.06%

GOLD

1D
-1.97%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
16.19%
6M
26.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CL=F vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CL=F
Crude Oil WTI
67.54%-2.08%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
16.19%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CL=F and GOLD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CL=F vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL=F
CL=F Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CL=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CL=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CL=F Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CL=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CL=F Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL=FGOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

CL=F vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CL=FGOLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

1.32

-1.25

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -92.04%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and GOLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CL=FGOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.04%

-40.58%

-51.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.79%

-38.32%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.81%

-17.25%

-23.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

Volatility

CL=F vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CL=FGOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.26%

58.82%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.90%

58.82%

-19.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.55%

58.82%

-9.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CL=F and GOLD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CL=F and GOLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer