PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL=F vs. GOLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CL=FGOLD
YTD Return11.74%-0.42%
1Y Return11.41%2.97%
3Y Return (Ann)6.02%-7.67%
5Y Return (Ann)4.26%10.68%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.14%2.51%
Sharpe Ratio0.26-0.02
Daily Std Dev27.48%29.39%
Max Drawdown-93.11%-88.52%
Current Drawdown-44.90%-59.62%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CL=F and GOLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CL=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CL=F has underperformed GOLD with an annualized return of -2.14%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
187.47%
4,156.48%
CL=F
GOLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crude Oil WTI

Barrick Gold Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.500.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.001.002.000.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.48
GOLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.500.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.001.002.000.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.46

CL=F vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the GOLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL=F and GOLD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.26
0.18
CL=F
GOLD

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -93.11%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-44.90%
-59.62%
CL=F
GOLD

Volatility

CL=F vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) is 5.26%, while Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that CL=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.26%
7.09%
CL=F
GOLD