CL=F vs. GOLD
CL=F (Crude Oil WTI) is an asset, while GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CL=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 67.54% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 16.19% return.
CL=F
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- 67.54%
- 6M
- 63.19%
- 1Y
- 51.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
GOLD
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- 16.19%
- 6M
- 26.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CL=F vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CL=F Crude Oil WTI | 67.54% | -2.08% |
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 16.19% | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL=F and GOLD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL=F vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank
CL=F
GOLD
CL=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.32 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
CL=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -92.04%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and GOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.04% | -40.58% | -51.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.79% | -38.32% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.81% | -17.25% | -23.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.27% | — | — |
Volatility
CL=F vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.26% | 58.82% | -9.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.90% | 58.82% | -19.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.55% | 58.82% | -9.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CL=F and GOLD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CL=F and GOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer