PortfoliosLab logo
CJET vs. FAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CJET and FAT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CJET vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chijet Motor Company Inc. Ordinary Shares (CJET) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CJET:

-0.64

FAT:

-0.58

Sortino Ratio

CJET:

-1.46

FAT:

-0.33

Omega Ratio

CJET:

0.84

FAT:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

CJET:

-0.89

FAT:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

CJET:

-1.12

FAT:

-1.23

Ulcer Index

CJET:

78.96%

FAT:

18.64%

Daily Std Dev

CJET:

136.25%

FAT:

53.61%

Max Drawdown

CJET:

-99.35%

FAT:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

CJET:

-99.05%

FAT:

-62.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CJET:

$47.88M

FAT:

$41.43M

EPS

CJET:

-$8.66

FAT:

-$11.39

PS Ratio

CJET:

6.92

FAT:

0.07

PB Ratio

CJET:

0.00

FAT:

12.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CJET:

$1.70M

FAT:

$142.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CJET:

-$6.17M

FAT:

$46.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CJET:

-$7.41M

FAT:

-$68.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJET achieves a -27.59% return, which is significantly lower than FAT's -26.11% return.


CJET

YTD

-27.59%

1M

-12.04%

6M

-18.45%

1Y

-86.67%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FAT

YTD

-26.11%

1M

-19.49%

6M

-28.14%

1Y

-30.68%

3Y*

-11.36%

5Y*

31.20%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAT Brands Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CJET vs. FAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CJET is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CJET is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CJET is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CJET is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CJET is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CJET is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAT is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAT is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAT is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAT is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAT is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CJET vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chijet Motor Company Inc. Ordinary Shares (CJET) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CJET Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJET and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CJET vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

CJET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
CJET
Chijet Motor Company Inc. Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
7.12%10.53%9.24%10.92%4.66%0.00%6.37%18.89%

Drawdowns

CJET vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJET drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJET and FAT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CJET vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Chijet Motor Company Inc. Ordinary Shares (CJET) has a higher volatility of 30.86% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 19.81%. This indicates that CJET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CJET vs. FAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chijet Motor Company Inc. Ordinary Shares and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
1.70M
142.02B
(CJET) Total Revenue
(FAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items