CISIX vs. WFSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX).
CISIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000. WFSPX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Jul 30, 1993.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CISIX or WFSPX.
Correlation
The correlation between CISIX and WFSPX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CISIX:
1.21
WFSPX:
1.44
CISIX:
1.67
WFSPX:
1.96
CISIX:
1.22
WFSPX:
1.26
CISIX:
1.81
WFSPX:
2.20
CISIX:
6.54
WFSPX:
8.82
CISIX:
2.52%
WFSPX:
2.11%
CISIX:
13.66%
WFSPX:
12.94%
CISIX:
-58.02%
WFSPX:
-89.72%
CISIX:
-4.00%
WFSPX:
-3.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CISIX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CISIX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.
CISIX
0.61%
-2.62%
4.80%
15.14%
15.16%
11.35%
WFSPX
1.43%
-1.81%
5.96%
17.19%
15.53%
12.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CISIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CISIX vs. WFSPX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CISIX
WFSPX
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
CISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than WFSPX's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund | 0.93% | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.17% | 0.79% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 0.97% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.25% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.99% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISIX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISIX and WFSPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CISIX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.