CIPMX vs. VOO
CIPMX (Champlain Mid Cap Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - CIPMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Champlain Funds, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX returned 9.76%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPMX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CIPMX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.76%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
CIPMX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- -1.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
CIPMX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | -2.90% | 1.44% | 13.94% | 15.40% | -26.53% | 24.48% | 29.03% | 26.27% | 3.41% | 13.62% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPMX and VOO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CIPMX and VOO has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPMX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CIPMX
VOO
CIPMX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIPMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.67 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 11.96 | -12.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIPMX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -33.99% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -8.90% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -18.69% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.20% | -24.52% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -33.99% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -3.14% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -3.68% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 1.99% | +3.84% |
Volatility
CIPMX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that CIPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 4.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 9.82% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 12.46% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 16.91% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 18.02% | +0.87% |
CIPMX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPMX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | 18.72% | 18.17% | 15.31% | 0.30% | 1.44% | 10.24% | 4.62% | 4.06% | 6.70% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 8.32% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPMX and VOO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIPMX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPMX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer