PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIPMX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.


CIPMX

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
-1.76%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
9.76%

FSMDX

1D
0.53%
1M
3.31%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.50%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIPMX
Champlain Mid Cap Fund
-2.90%1.44%13.94%15.40%-26.53%24.48%29.03%26.27%3.41%13.62%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.03%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CIPMX and FSMDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between CIPMX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIPMX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIPMX
CIPMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CIPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CIPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIPMXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

2.90

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

11.11

-11.27

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIPMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIPMX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIPMXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.33%

-40.35%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-8.16%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-20.92%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.20%

-26.07%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-40.35%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-0.26%

-6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-4.94%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

2.13%

+3.70%

Volatility

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 4.43%. This indicates that CIPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIPMXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

4.43%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

10.46%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

13.85%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.32%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

19.35%

-0.46%

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIPMX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than FSMDX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIPMX
Champlain Mid Cap Fund
18.72%18.17%15.31%0.30%1.44%10.24%4.62%4.06%6.70%0.00%4.28%8.32%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.97%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIPMX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIPMX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FSMDX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIPMX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer