CIO vs. QLD

In the year-to-date period, CIO achieves a -4.74% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -19.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CIO has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -1.99%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIO and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than QLD's 0.28% yield.

The maximum CIO drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIO and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO) is 12.54%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 32.70%. This indicates that CIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.