CINF vs. IRM
Compare and contrast key facts about Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CINF or IRM.
Key characteristics
| CINF | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 46.60% | 74.81% |
| 1Y Return | 54.19% | 109.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.05% | 41.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.36% | 37.17% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.56% | 19.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.48 | 4.21 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.19 | 4.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.68 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.97 | 10.05 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.69 | 36.88 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.38% | 2.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.36% | 25.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.64% | -55.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.66% | -6.58% |
Fundamentals
| CINF | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.24B | $35.13B |
| EPS | $19.67 | $0.37 |
| PE Ratio | 7.56 | 323.54 |
| PEG Ratio | -158.72 | 1.08 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $12.15B | $4.43B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $12.12B | $2.06B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.47B | $1.54B |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and IRM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CINF vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 46.60% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 74.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 14.56%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CINF vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CINF vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than IRM's 2.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.14% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% | 3.40% | 3.16% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.23% | 3.63% | 4.97% | 4.73% | 8.40% | 7.69% | 7.33% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% | 6.05% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
CINF vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CINF vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is 8.76%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 11.87%. This indicates that CINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CINF vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities