PortfoliosLab logo
CINF vs. IRM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and IRM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CINF vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CINF:

1.21

IRM:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

CINF:

1.68

IRM:

1.25

Omega Ratio

CINF:

1.23

IRM:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

CINF:

1.54

IRM:

0.73

Martin Ratio

CINF:

3.88

IRM:

1.67

Ulcer Index

CINF:

7.94%

IRM:

17.10%

Daily Std Dev

CINF:

25.36%

IRM:

33.00%

Max Drawdown

CINF:

-59.64%

IRM:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

CINF:

-4.70%

IRM:

-20.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CINF:

$23.34B

IRM:

$29.36B

EPS

CINF:

$9.17

IRM:

$0.41

PE Ratio

CINF:

16.28

IRM:

242.68

PEG Ratio

CINF:

-158.72

IRM:

1.08

PS Ratio

CINF:

2.13

IRM:

4.69

PB Ratio

CINF:

1.70

IRM:

1.52K

Total Revenue (TTM)

CINF:

$10.97B

IRM:

$6.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CINF:

$10.97B

IRM:

$3.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CINF:

$1.97B

IRM:

$2.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than IRM's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 14.61%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.13% annualized return.


CINF

YTD

5.61%

1M

14.19%

6M

0.56%

1Y

30.47%

5Y*

28.51%

10Y*

14.61%

IRM

YTD

-3.41%

1M

21.76%

6M

-11.05%

1Y

26.31%

5Y*

42.26%

10Y*

17.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CINF vs. IRM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CINF is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CINF is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CINF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CINF is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CINF is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CINF is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRM is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRM is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRM is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRM is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CINF vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and IRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CINF vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than IRM's 2.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.19%2.25%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.33%2.53%3.89%3.40%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
2.85%3.34%3.63%4.96%4.73%8.39%7.69%7.32%5.93%6.17%7.07%6.05%

Drawdowns

CINF vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CINF vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) at 7.01%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CINF vs. IRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.57B
1.59B
(CINF) Total Revenue
(IRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CINF vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
55.4%
(CINF) Gross Margin
(IRM) Gross Margin
CINF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.57B and revenue of 2.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 882.33M and revenue of 1.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

CINF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of -128.00M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.0%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 254.29M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

CINF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of -90.00M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in a net margin of -3.5%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 15.95M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.