PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CINF vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CINF vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than AGNC's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 11.49%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.21% annualized return.


CINF

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
11.49%

AGNC

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
0.27%
6M
3.92%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CINF vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
-2.68%16.27%42.48%4.00%-7.89%33.28%-14.15%38.87%6.25%2.34%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
0.27%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and AGNC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.34

The correlation between CINF and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CINF:

$23.30

AGNC:

$1.33

PE Ratio

CINF:

6.78

AGNC:

7.64

PEG Ratio

CINF:

0.20

AGNC:

0.02

PS Ratio

CINF:

1.45

AGNC:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

CINF:

$12.92B

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CINF:

$5.39B

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

CINF:

$3.27B

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CINF vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF
CINF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINF vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CINFAGNCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

1.57

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

2.18

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.27

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.62

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.66

4.90

-3.24

CINF vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CINFAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

1.57

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.06

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.25

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.43

-0.01

Drawdowns

CINF vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CINFAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-54.56%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.46%

-18.71%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-31.04%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.77%

-54.56%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.12%

-54.56%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-11.67%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-13.57%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

6.17%

-2.12%

Volatility

CINF vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is 4.44%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that CINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CINFAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.78%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

15.86%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

19.35%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.65%

25.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.79%

25.38%

+3.41%

Dividends

CINF vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than AGNC's 14.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
14.16%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.25%2.13%2.25%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.33%2.53%3.89%

Financials

CINF vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.86B
0
(CINF) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CINF and AGNC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNC has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to CINF (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CINF and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer