CIND.L vs. VYM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
CIND.L and VYM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIND.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. VYM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2006. Both CIND.L and VYM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIND.L or VYM.
Key characteristics
| CIND.L | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.63% | 6.49% |
| 1Y Return | 17.69% | 16.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.38% | 6.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.45% | 10.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.71% | 9.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.84 | 1.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.54% | 10.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.68% | -56.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.23% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and VYM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CIND.L vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CIND.L has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.71%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIND.L vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIND.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIND.L vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIND.L vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
CIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.89% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% | 2.78% | 2.81% |
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and VYM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIND.L vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.