PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIND.L vs. SCHW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CIND.LSCHW
YTD Return18.14%15.33%
1Y Return30.15%47.05%
3Y Return (Ann)8.45%-0.21%
5Y Return (Ann)11.30%14.17%
10Y Return (Ann)11.35%11.85%
Sharpe Ratio2.611.65
Sortino Ratio3.692.33
Omega Ratio1.481.33
Calmar Ratio5.111.09
Martin Ratio14.144.28
Ulcer Index1.98%10.71%
Daily Std Dev10.83%27.71%
Max Drawdown-36.68%-86.79%
Current Drawdown-0.52%-14.59%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CIND.L and SCHW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHW's 15.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CIND.L having a 11.35% annualized return and SCHW not far ahead at 11.85%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.45%
0.12%
CIND.L
SCHW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIND.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIND.L, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIND.L, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIND.L, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIND.L, currently valued at 5.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIND.L, currently valued at 13.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.76
SCHW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHW, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHW, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHW, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHW, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHW, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.73

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIND.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SCHW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIND.L and SCHW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.55
1.47
CIND.L
SCHW

Dividends

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison

CIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIND.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
1.28%1.45%1.01%0.86%1.36%1.43%1.11%0.62%0.68%0.73%0.79%0.92%

Drawdowns

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and SCHW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.52%
-14.59%
CIND.L
SCHW

Volatility

CIND.L vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) is 4.26%, while The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) has a volatility of 10.72%. This indicates that CIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.26%
10.72%
CIND.L
SCHW