PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIM vs. MPW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIMMPW
YTD Return10.09%7.81%
1Y Return20.91%17.53%
3Y Return (Ann)-23.90%-32.64%
5Y Return (Ann)-14.69%-18.33%
10Y Return (Ann)0.48%-2.89%
Sharpe Ratio0.450.18
Sortino Ratio0.870.82
Omega Ratio1.111.10
Calmar Ratio0.230.16
Martin Ratio1.410.63
Ulcer Index11.64%21.10%
Daily Std Dev36.64%74.48%
Max Drawdown-89.69%-84.50%
Current Drawdown-60.91%-73.28%

Fundamentals


CIMMPW
Market Cap$1.24B$2.95B
EPS$3.36-$3.14
PEG Ratio-28.141.93
Total Revenue (TTM)$631.62M$641.32M
Gross Profit (TTM)$582.22M-$325.21M
EBITDA (TTM)$607.64M-$791.75M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CIM and MPW is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CIM vs. MPW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than MPW's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has outperformed MPW with an annualized return of 0.48%, while MPW has yielded a comparatively lower -2.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.21%
7.41%
CIM
MPW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIM vs. MPW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.41
MPW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPW, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPW, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPW, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPW, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPW, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.63

CIM vs. MPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the MPW Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and MPW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.45
0.18
CIM
MPW

Dividends

CIM vs. MPW - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, less than MPW's 10.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
9.03%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%10.82%14.34%14.08%17.61%11.61%
MPW
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
10.79%17.92%10.41%4.74%4.96%4.83%6.22%6.97%7.40%7.65%6.10%6.63%

Drawdowns

CIM vs. MPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than MPW's maximum drawdown of -84.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and MPW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.91%
-73.28%
CIM
MPW

Volatility

CIM vs. MPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is 8.04%, while Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) has a volatility of 16.51%. This indicates that CIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.04%
16.51%
CIM
MPW

Financials

CIM vs. MPW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Medical Properties Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items