CIM vs. GOLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIM or GOLD.
Key characteristics
| CIM | GOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.64% | 6.23% |
| 1Y Return | 12.18% | 18.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -24.77% | 1.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -14.93% | 5.66% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.54% | 6.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.34 | 0.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.07 | 1.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.62% | 9.36% |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.63% | 33.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.69% | -88.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -61.78% | -56.92% |
Fundamentals
| CIM | GOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $33.45B |
| EPS | $1.73 | $0.85 |
| PE Ratio | 8.66 | 22.24 |
| PEG Ratio | -28.14 | 2.34 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $514.94M | $9.04B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $465.55M | $2.92B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $471.17M | $2.63B |
Correlation
The correlation between CIM and GOLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CIM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has underperformed GOLD with an annualized return of 0.54%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison
CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than GOLD's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 9.24% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 10.82% | 14.34% | 14.08% | 17.61% | 11.61% |
GOLD Barrick Gold Corporation | 2.12% | 2.21% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 1.36% | 0.70% | 1.40% | 0.83% | 0.50% | 1.89% | 1.86% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
CIM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLD drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIM vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is 7.96%, while Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that CIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CIM vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities