CIM vs. GOLD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CIM (Chimera Investment Corporation) and GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) are both stocks. CIM operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while GOLD operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CIM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 22.50% return.

CIM

• 1D: 13.82%
• 1M: 9.83%
• 6M: 25.09%
• YTD: 24.29%
• 1Y: 21.70%
• 3Y*: 2.49%
• 5Y*: -9.94%
• 10Y*: -1.20%
• ALL TIME*: -1.64%

GOLD

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: -5.98%
• 6M: -19.55%
• YTD: 22.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation	$7.78M	$7.86M	$8.93M
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation	$13.90M	$15.32M	$19.34M

CIM vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation	24.29%	-0.39%
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation	22.50%	13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CIM and GOLD is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap CIM : $1.04B GOLD : $1.20B
EPS CIM : $0.23 GOLD : $3.15
PE Ratio CIM : 53.45 GOLD : 13.12
PS Ratio CIM : 2.07 GOLD : 0.05
PB Ratio CIM : 0.42 GOLD : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) CIM : $499.18M GOLD : $23.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) CIM : $465.68M GOLD : $169.58M
EBITDA (TTM) CIM : $439.34M GOLD : -$162.41M

Return for Risk

CIM vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIM

CIM Risk / Return Rank: 69
CIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CIM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CIM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIM	GOLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	—	—

Drawdowns

CIM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and GOLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIM	GOLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.69%	-40.93%	-48.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.58%	-34.97%	-19.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.79%	-21.49%	-30.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIM	GOLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.78%	55.58%	-26.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.61%	55.58%	-19.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.77%	55.58%	-18.81%

Dividends

CIM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.73%, more than GOLD's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation	26.73%	11.91%	10.14%	14.03%	20.36%	8.55%	13.66%	9.73%	11.22%	8.12%	14.34%	28.15%
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIM and GOLD in my portfolio?

CIM and GOLD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.