PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIM vs. GOLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIMGOLD
YTD Return-6.71%-3.04%
1Y Return5.40%-4.81%
3Y Return (Ann)-21.71%-7.12%
5Y Return (Ann)-15.39%10.10%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.10%2.26%
Sharpe Ratio0.08-0.26
Daily Std Dev36.97%29.52%
Max Drawdown-89.69%-88.52%
Current Drawdown-66.88%-60.68%

Fundamentals


CIMGOLD
Market Cap$1.11B$29.72B
EPS$0.51$0.82
PE Ratio9.0420.65
PEG Ratio-28.142.22
Revenue (TTM)$291.99M$11.50B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$421.69M$3.47B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CIM and GOLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has underperformed GOLD with an annualized return of -0.10%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-51.29%
-44.65%
CIM
GOLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Chimera Investment Corporation

Barrick Gold Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.16
GOLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOLD, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOLD, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOLD, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOLD, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOLD, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.61

CIM vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the GOLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CIM and GOLD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.08
-0.26
CIM
GOLD

Dividends

CIM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than GOLD's 2.30% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
12.78%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%10.82%14.34%14.08%17.61%11.61%
GOLD
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.30%2.21%3.76%4.05%1.34%0.69%1.38%0.82%0.49%1.87%1.84%2.80%

Drawdowns

CIM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLD drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-72.00%-70.00%-68.00%-66.00%-64.00%-62.00%-60.00%-58.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-66.88%
-60.68%
CIM
GOLD

Volatility

CIM vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a higher volatility of 13.68% compared to Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) at 8.37%. This indicates that CIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.68%
8.37%
CIM
GOLD

Financials

CIM vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items