PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIM vs. GOLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CIM and GOLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

CIM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-54.71%
-34.29%
CIM
GOLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CIM:

0.19

GOLD:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

CIM:

0.52

GOLD:

1.20

Omega Ratio

CIM:

1.07

GOLD:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CIM:

0.10

GOLD:

0.39

Martin Ratio

CIM:

0.65

GOLD:

2.01

Ulcer Index

CIM:

10.55%

GOLD:

12.52%

Daily Std Dev

CIM:

35.84%

GOLD:

34.56%

Max Drawdown

CIM:

-89.69%

GOLD:

-88.51%

Current Drawdown

CIM:

-69.20%

GOLD:

-53.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIM:

$921.71M

GOLD:

$34.69B

EPS

CIM:

$1.10

GOLD:

$1.22

PE Ratio

CIM:

10.35

GOLD:

16.53

PEG Ratio

CIM:

-28.14

GOLD:

3.01

PS Ratio

CIM:

3.32

GOLD:

2.68

PB Ratio

CIM:

0.36

GOLD:

1.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIM:

$559.34M

GOLD:

$10.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIM:

$473.18M

GOLD:

$4.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIM:

$414.13M

GOLD:

$5.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 30.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has underperformed GOLD with an annualized return of -2.15%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.62% annualized return.


CIM

YTD

-16.28%

1M

-14.26%

6M

-25.12%

1Y

5.01%

5Y*

-2.00%

10Y*

-2.15%

GOLD

YTD

30.86%

1M

4.02%

6M

-2.49%

1Y

21.45%

5Y*

-1.18%

10Y*

6.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIM vs. GOLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIM is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIM is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIM is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIM is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOLD is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOLD is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CIM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CIM: 0.19
GOLD: 0.73
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CIM: 0.52
GOLD: 1.20
The chart of Omega ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CIM: 1.07
GOLD: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
CIM: 0.10
GOLD: 0.39
The chart of Martin ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CIM: 0.65
GOLD: 2.01

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the GOLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and GOLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.19
0.73
CIM
GOLD

Dividends

CIM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than GOLD's 1.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
12.82%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%10.82%14.34%14.08%17.61%
GOLD
Barrick Gold Corporation
1.98%2.58%2.21%3.78%4.11%1.36%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%1.87%

Drawdowns

CIM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLD drawdown of -88.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-69.20%
-53.34%
CIM
GOLD

Volatility

CIM vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a higher volatility of 16.31% compared to Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) at 15.12%. This indicates that CIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.31%
15.12%
CIM
GOLD

Financials

CIM vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab