PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIG vs. TX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIG vs. TX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and Ternium S.A. (TX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIG achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than TX's 38.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CIG has outperformed TX with an annualized return of 20.43%, while TX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.13% annualized return.


CIG

1D
2.38%
1M
-12.15%
YTD
11.86%
6M
10.80%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
23.82%
10Y*
20.43%

TX

1D
4.40%
1M
21.56%
YTD
38.11%
6M
39.98%
1Y
87.60%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIG vs. TX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
11.86%28.04%9.38%20.62%60.40%-6.09%-7.92%-1.14%84.56%-8.17%
TX
Ternium S.A.
38.11%43.56%-25.86%49.94%-24.80%60.96%32.18%-14.86%-11.86%36.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CIG and TX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIG:

$6.15B

TX:

$10.06B

EPS

CIG:

$1.69

TX:

$2.90

PE Ratio

CIG:

1.27

TX:

17.64

PEG Ratio

CIG:

0.12

TX:

0.30

PS Ratio

CIG:

0.14

TX:

0.65

PB Ratio

CIG:

0.22

TX:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIG:

$43.35B

TX:

$15.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIG:

$6.06B

TX:

$2.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIG:

$6.81B

TX:

$1.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIG vs. TX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIG
CIG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TX
TX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIG vs. TX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and Ternium S.A. (TX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIGTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

2.90

-1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

3.70

-2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

5.68

-4.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.05

18.58

-14.54

CIG vs. TX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the TX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIG and TX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.90

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.41

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.18

-0.04

Drawdowns

CIG vs. TX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIG drawdown since its inception was -88.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TX drawdown of -89.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIG and TX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.84%

-89.66%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-17.17%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-42.04%

+19.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-49.48%

+23.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.73%

-74.94%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.55%

0.00%

-19.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-31.30%

-10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

5.25%

+1.88%

Volatility

CIG vs. TX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) is 8.58%, while Ternium S.A. (TX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that CIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

15.40%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.90%

23.41%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.99%

30.78%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.64%

35.32%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.79%

37.92%

+8.87%

Dividends

CIG vs. TX - Dividend Comparison

CIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than TX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
11.05%12.02%11.10%5.50%13.28%10.94%3.94%3.35%4.20%1.98%7.39%7.78%
TX
Ternium S.A.
4.29%7.07%10.66%6.83%8.84%6.66%0.00%5.45%4.06%3.17%3.73%7.24%

Financials

CIG vs. TX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and Ternium S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
10.27B
3.93B
(CIG) Total Revenue
(TX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIG vs. TX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and Ternium S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
15.8%
17.5%
Portfolio components
CIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 10.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

TX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a gross profit of 686.87M and revenue of 3.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.

CIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

TX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported an operating income of 290.07M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

CIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a net income of 960.23M and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

TX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a net income of 213.02M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIG and TX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to CIG (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIG dropped -88.84% vs TX's -89.66%.

TX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIG and TX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer