PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIG vs. GM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIG vs. GM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and General Motors Company (GM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIG achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than GM's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CIG has outperformed GM with an annualized return of 14.98%, while GM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.75% annualized return.


CIG

1D
-3.18%
1M
4.07%
6M
13.73%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
27.46%
10Y*
14.98%

GM

1D
-1.45%
1M
-5.87%
6M
-7.03%
YTD
-5.23%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIG vs. GM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
13.16%28.04%9.38%20.62%60.40%-6.09%-7.92%-1.14%84.56%-8.17%
GM
General Motors Company
-5.23%54.24%49.84%7.92%-42.36%40.80%15.16%14.02%-15.06%22.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CIG and GM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIG:

$6.09B

GM:

$69.18B

EPS

CIG:

R$1.69

GM:

$2.71

PE Ratio

CIG:

6.42

GM:

28.34

PS Ratio

CIG:

0.72

GM:

0.39

PB Ratio

CIG:

1.09

GM:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIG:

R$43.35B

GM:

$184.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIG:

R$6.06B

GM:

$11.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIG:

R$6.81B

GM:

$13.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIG vs. GM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIG
CIG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GM
GM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIG vs. GM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and General Motors Company (GM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIGGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.83

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

6.49

-3.97

CIG vs. GM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the GM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIG and GM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIG vs. GM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIG drawdown since its inception was -88.84%, which is greater than GM's maximum drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIG and GM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.84%

-59.96%

-28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.67%

-16.00%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.67%

-33.19%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-58.96%

+32.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.73%

-59.96%

-5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.62%

-10.78%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.56%

-21.45%

-20.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

6.96%

+2.81%

Volatility

CIG vs. GM - Volatility Comparison

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and General Motors Company (GM) have volatilities of 8.02% and 7.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

7.79%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

24.22%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.23%

34.84%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.50%

36.66%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.10%

36.95%

+9.15%

Dividends

CIG vs. GM - Dividend Comparison

CIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than GM's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
11.39%12.02%11.10%5.50%13.28%10.94%3.94%3.35%4.20%1.98%7.39%7.78%
GM
General Motors Company
0.86%0.70%0.90%1.00%0.54%0.00%0.91%4.15%4.54%3.71%4.36%4.06%

Financials

CIG vs. GM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and General Motors Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
10.27B
43.62B
(CIG) Total Revenue
(GM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CIG values in BRL, GM values in USD

CIG vs. GM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and General Motors Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
15.8%
11.5%
Portfolio components
CIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 10.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

GM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Motors Company reported a gross profit of 5.00B and revenue of 43.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

CIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

GM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Motors Company reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

CIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a net income of 960.23M and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

GM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Motors Company reported a net income of 2.63B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIG and GM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIG has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to GM (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIG dropped -88.84% vs GM's -59.96%.

GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIG and GM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer