PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIG vs. FSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIG vs. FSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIG achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than FSK's -22.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CIG has outperformed FSK with an annualized return of 20.43%, while FSK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.


CIG

1D
2.38%
1M
-12.15%
YTD
11.86%
6M
10.80%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
23.82%
10Y*
20.43%

FSK

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.63%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-24.37%
1Y
-38.78%
3Y*
-4.25%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIG vs. FSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
11.86%28.04%9.38%20.62%60.40%-6.09%-7.92%-1.14%84.56%-8.17%
FSK
FS KKR Capital Corp.
-22.79%-20.38%25.71%33.04%-4.71%41.59%-10.27%33.89%-20.23%-21.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CIG and FSK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2014

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIG:

$6.15B

FSK:

$3.05B

EPS

CIG:

$1.69

FSK:

-$0.39

PS Ratio

CIG:

0.14

FSK:

3.83

PB Ratio

CIG:

0.22

FSK:

0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIG:

$43.35B

FSK:

$798.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIG:

$6.06B

FSK:

$172.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIG:

$6.81B

FSK:

$110.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIG vs. FSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIG
CIG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FSK
FSK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSK Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIG vs. FSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIGFSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

-1.28

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

-1.79

+3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.76

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

-0.77

+2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.05

-1.23

+5.27

CIG vs. FSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the FSK Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIG and FSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIGFSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

-1.28

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

-0.02

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.09

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.10

+0.04

Drawdowns

CIG vs. FSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIG drawdown since its inception was -88.84%, which is greater than FSK's maximum drawdown of -67.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIG and FSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGFSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.84%

-67.20%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-51.01%

+29.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-51.03%

+28.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-51.03%

+25.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.73%

-67.20%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.55%

-44.51%

+24.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-13.45%

-28.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

31.90%

-24.77%

Volatility

CIG vs. FSK - Volatility Comparison

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) at 6.87%. This indicates that CIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGFSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

6.87%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.90%

26.55%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.99%

30.51%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.64%

24.05%

+13.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.79%

27.90%

+18.89%

Dividends

CIG vs. FSK - Dividend Comparison

CIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, less than FSK's 23.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
11.05%12.02%11.10%5.50%13.28%10.94%3.94%3.35%4.20%1.98%7.39%7.78%
FSK
FS KKR Capital Corp.
23.67%18.91%13.35%14.77%15.20%11.80%15.46%12.40%16.41%11.68%8.65%9.91%

Financials

CIG vs. FSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and FS KKR Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
10.27B
304.00M
(CIG) Total Revenue
(FSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIG vs. FSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and FS KKR Capital Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
15.8%
0
Portfolio components
CIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 10.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

FSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FS KKR Capital Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 304.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

FSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FS KKR Capital Corp. reported an operating income of -1.57M and revenue of 304.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

CIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais reported a net income of 960.23M and revenue of 10.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

FSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FS KKR Capital Corp. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 304.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIG and FSK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIG has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to FSK (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIG dropped -88.84% vs FSK's -67.20%.

CIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIG and FSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer