PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIFR vs. TSLA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIFRTSLA
YTD Return73.37%29.27%
1Y Return129.49%52.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.40%-1.99%
Sharpe Ratio0.830.74
Sortino Ratio1.991.49
Omega Ratio1.221.18
Calmar Ratio1.190.68
Martin Ratio3.181.95
Ulcer Index31.58%22.86%
Daily Std Dev120.85%60.53%
Max Drawdown-97.16%-73.63%
Current Drawdown-50.69%-21.65%

Fundamentals


CIFRTSLA
Market Cap$2.49B$1.03T
EPS-$0.15$3.66
Total Revenue (TTM)$152.47M$97.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)$11.39M$17.71B
EBITDA (TTM)-$38.31M$13.83B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CIFR and TSLA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIFR vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 73.37% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's 29.27% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
92.49%
90.66%
CIFR
TSLA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIFR vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.18
TSLA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.95

CIFR vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.83
0.74
CIFR
TSLA

Dividends

CIFR vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and TSLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-50.69%
-21.65%
CIFR
TSLA

Volatility

CIFR vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 36.56% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 28.02%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.56%
28.02%
CIFR
TSLA

Financials

CIFR vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items