PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIDVX vs. IIPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CIDVX and IIPR is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CIDVX vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Dividend Growth Fund (CIDVX) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.18%
-37.09%
CIDVX
IIPR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CIDVX:

1.51

IIPR:

-0.37

Sortino Ratio

CIDVX:

2.07

IIPR:

-0.24

Omega Ratio

CIDVX:

1.28

IIPR:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

CIDVX:

2.16

IIPR:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

CIDVX:

8.04

IIPR:

-0.70

Ulcer Index

CIDVX:

2.43%

IIPR:

20.59%

Daily Std Dev

CIDVX:

12.95%

IIPR:

38.52%

Max Drawdown

CIDVX:

-36.99%

IIPR:

-75.43%

Current Drawdown

CIDVX:

-1.46%

IIPR:

-67.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIDVX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's 9.35% return.


CIDVX

YTD

4.14%

1M

1.02%

6M

8.18%

1Y

20.27%

5Y*

9.02%

10Y*

7.08%

IIPR

YTD

9.35%

1M

4.32%

6M

-37.09%

1Y

-12.85%

5Y*

-1.49%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIDVX vs. IIPR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIDVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIDVX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIDVX is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIDVX is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIDVX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIDVX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIDVX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IIPR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IIPR is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IIPR is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IIPR is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IIPR is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IIPR is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IIPR is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CIDVX vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dividend Growth Fund (CIDVX) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIDVX, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.51-0.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIDVX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.07-0.24
The chart of Omega ratio for CIDVX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.280.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIDVX, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.16-0.20
The chart of Martin ratio for CIDVX, currently valued at 8.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.04-0.70
CIDVX
IIPR

The current CIDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the IIPR Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIDVX and IIPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.51
-0.37
CIDVX
IIPR

Dividends

CIDVX vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison

CIDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than IIPR's 10.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CIDVX
Calamos Dividend Growth Fund
0.08%0.08%0.30%0.44%0.19%0.37%0.90%0.94%0.86%1.14%0.38%2.85%
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
10.32%11.28%7.16%7.01%2.18%2.44%3.73%2.64%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CIDVX vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIDVX drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum IIPR drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIDVX and IIPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.46%
-67.82%
CIDVX
IIPR

Volatility

CIDVX vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Dividend Growth Fund (CIDVX) is 3.35%, while Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that CIDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.35%
12.58%
CIDVX
IIPR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab