CID vs. IWB
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF (CID) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB).
CID and IWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CID is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both CID and IWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CID or IWB.
Correlation
The correlation between CID and IWB is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CID vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CID:
0.79
IWB:
1.94
CID:
3,074.27
IWB:
2.59
CID:
612.48
IWB:
1.36
CID:
2,381.08
IWB:
2.93
CID:
10,171.03
IWB:
12.86
CID:
8.67%
IWB:
1.92%
CID:
111,748.82%
IWB:
12.71%
CID:
-42.78%
IWB:
-55.38%
CID:
-28.11%
IWB:
-4.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CID achieves a 86,102.15% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 23.71% return.
CID
86,102.15%
-10.74%
85,132.37%
87,420.44%
300.14%
N/A
IWB
23.71%
-0.69%
8.01%
23.81%
14.13%
12.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CID vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CID vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF (CID) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CID vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
CID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IWB's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CID VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF | 0.01% | 4.93% | 5.70% | 5.21% | 3.27% | 4.72% | 5.02% | 3.53% | 3.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
CID vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CID drawdown since its inception was -42.78%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CID and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CID vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF (CID) has a higher volatility of 43.70% compared to iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) at 3.85%. This indicates that CID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.