CIBR vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
CIBR and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both CIBR and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIBR or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and COWZ is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CIBR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CIBR:
1.01
COWZ:
1.26
CIBR:
1.41
COWZ:
1.82
CIBR:
1.18
COWZ:
1.22
CIBR:
1.64
COWZ:
1.99
CIBR:
3.91
COWZ:
4.58
CIBR:
4.96%
COWZ:
3.76%
CIBR:
19.17%
COWZ:
13.65%
CIBR:
-33.89%
COWZ:
-38.63%
CIBR:
-3.43%
COWZ:
-4.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 3.43% return.
CIBR
2.03%
2.26%
15.53%
16.90%
15.96%
N/A
COWZ
3.43%
4.64%
5.16%
16.10%
15.70%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIBR vs. COWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CIBR
COWZ
CIBR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIBR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than COWZ's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.28% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.30% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.76% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIBR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.25%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.