CIA vs. UNM

In the year-to-date period, CIA achieves a -8.23% return, which is significantly lower than UNM's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CIA has underperformed UNM with an annualized return of -5.07%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens, Inc. (CIA) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the UNM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIA and UNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.

The maximum CIA drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UNM drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIA and UNM.

Citizens, Inc. (CIA) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to Unum Group (UNM) at 5.78%. This indicates that CIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens, Inc. and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.