CI vs. MRK
Compare and contrast key facts about Cigna Corporation (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CI or MRK.
Correlation
The correlation between CI and MRK is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CI vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CI:
-0.47
MRK:
-1.40
CI:
-0.50
MRK:
-1.89
CI:
0.93
MRK:
0.74
CI:
-0.42
MRK:
-0.87
CI:
-1.03
MRK:
-2.00
CI:
11.22%
MRK:
16.02%
CI:
24.80%
MRK:
22.86%
CI:
-84.34%
MRK:
-68.62%
CI:
-19.32%
MRK:
-36.43%
Fundamentals
CI:
$82.09B
MRK:
$209.99B
CI:
$11.81
MRK:
$6.74
CI:
24.75
MRK:
12.32
CI:
0.90
MRK:
0.18
CI:
$179.59B
MRK:
$48.59B
CI:
$151.11B
MRK:
$36.68B
CI:
$8.25B
MRK:
$19.73B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than MRK's -16.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed MRK with an annualized return of 10.34%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.
CI
6.74%
3.79%
-13.27%
-12.17%
7.49%
10.34%
MRK
-16.27%
-14.94%
-26.60%
-33.04%
4.30%
7.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CI vs. MRK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CI
MRK
CI vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CI vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than MRK's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 1.90% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3.75% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% | 3.12% |
Drawdowns
CI vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MRK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CI vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) have volatilities of 10.82% and 10.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CI vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities