CI vs. MRK
Compare and contrast key facts about Cigna Corporation (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CI or MRK.
Correlation
The correlation between CI and MRK is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CI vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CI:
-0.25
MRK:
-0.65
CI:
-0.19
MRK:
-0.77
CI:
0.97
MRK:
0.89
CI:
-0.21
MRK:
-0.50
CI:
-0.61
MRK:
-1.02
CI:
9.46%
MRK:
13.34%
CI:
23.49%
MRK:
20.88%
CI:
-84.34%
MRK:
-68.62%
CI:
-21.98%
MRK:
-23.95%
Fundamentals
CI:
$79.28B
MRK:
$252.08B
CI:
$10.55
MRK:
$4.78
CI:
27.02
MRK:
20.85
CI:
0.68
MRK:
0.07
CI:
$179.59B
MRK:
$48.59B
CI:
$151.11B
MRK:
$36.68B
CI:
$8.25B
MRK:
$19.73B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than MRK's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed MRK with an annualized return of 11.01%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
CI
3.22%
1.12%
-15.42%
-5.01%
7.71%
11.01%
MRK
0.17%
-1.52%
-19.39%
-13.71%
5.97%
8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CI vs. MRK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CI
MRK
CI vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CI vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than MRK's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 1.96% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3.13% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% | 3.12% |
Drawdowns
CI vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MRK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CI vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 5.05%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CI vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities