PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CI vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cigna Group (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 19.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has underperformed MRK with an annualized return of 9.67%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.


CI

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.52%
6M
6.39%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
-1.09%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
9.67%

MRK

1D
-1.22%
1M
4.52%
6M
13.41%
YTD
19.09%
1Y
53.16%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CI vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CI
The Cigna Group
7.83%1.72%-6.27%-7.97%46.68%12.29%1.83%7.70%-6.46%52.29%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
19.09%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CI and MRK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1982

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CI:

$77.63B

MRK:

$305.12B

EPS

CI:

$23.64

MRK:

$3.59

PE Ratio

CI:

12.42

MRK:

34.37

PEG Ratio

CI:

0.72

MRK:

0.03

PS Ratio

CI:

0.28

MRK:

4.68

PB Ratio

CI:

1.84

MRK:

6.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

CI:

$277.94B

MRK:

$65.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CI:

$19.38B

MRK:

$49.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

CI:

$10.03B

MRK:

$22.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CI vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CI vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cigna Group (CI) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.32

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

4.59

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

11.28

-11.59

CI vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CI vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.34%

-68.61%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-11.37%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

-43.44%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

-43.44%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-43.44%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.09%

-4.65%

-12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-18.81%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

4.63%

+4.67%

Volatility

CI vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cigna Group (CI) is 6.79%, while Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

9.30%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

19.39%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.09%

27.85%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.49%

23.97%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.73%

23.05%

+7.68%

Dividends

CI vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than MRK's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
The Cigna Group
2.09%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.72%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%

Financials

CI vs. MRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Cigna Group and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
68.49B
16.29B
(CI) Total Revenue
(MRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CI vs. MRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Cigna Group and Merck & Co., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
81.9%
Portfolio components
CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Cigna Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Cigna Group reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

MRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Cigna Group reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

MRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CI and MRK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRK has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to CI (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs MRK's -68.61%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CI and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer