PortfoliosLab logo
CHRW vs. RIO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CHRW and RIO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CHRW vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,498.40%
1,521.77%
CHRW
RIO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHRW:

0.47

RIO:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

CHRW:

1.06

RIO:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

CHRW:

1.14

RIO:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

CHRW:

0.55

RIO:

-0.40

Martin Ratio

CHRW:

1.85

RIO:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

CHRW:

9.00%

RIO:

12.11%

Daily Std Dev

CHRW:

29.07%

RIO:

24.66%

Max Drawdown

CHRW:

-44.55%

RIO:

-88.97%

Current Drawdown

CHRW:

-20.96%

RIO:

-14.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHRW:

$10.68B

RIO:

$97.07B

EPS

CHRW:

$4.19

RIO:

$7.07

PE Ratio

CHRW:

21.47

RIO:

8.43

PEG Ratio

CHRW:

1.90

RIO:

0.00

PS Ratio

CHRW:

0.62

RIO:

1.80

PB Ratio

CHRW:

6.19

RIO:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHRW:

$17.36B

RIO:

$53.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHRW:

$5.09B

RIO:

$16.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHRW:

$807.40M

RIO:

$19.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRW has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 5.73%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


CHRW

YTD

-12.75%

1M

3.01%

6M

-15.97%

1Y

13.46%

5Y*

6.50%

10Y*

5.73%

RIO

YTD

4.30%

1M

13.11%

6M

-9.09%

1Y

-8.55%

5Y*

13.73%

10Y*

10.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHRW vs. RIO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHRW is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHRW is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHRW is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHRW is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHRW is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHRW is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIO is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIO is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIO is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIO is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIO is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIO is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHRW vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CHRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRW and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.47
-0.35
CHRW
RIO

Dividends

CHRW vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than RIO's 6.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
2.76%2.38%2.82%2.47%1.93%2.17%2.57%2.24%2.03%2.38%2.53%1.91%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
6.79%7.40%5.40%10.48%14.39%5.13%10.70%6.32%4.45%3.96%7.79%4.46%

Drawdowns

CHRW vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-20.96%
-14.25%
CHRW
RIO

Volatility

CHRW vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO) have volatilities of 8.67% and 8.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.67%
8.97%
CHRW
RIO

Financials

CHRW vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
4.05B
26.86B
(CHRW) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHRW vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
27.8%
(CHRW) Gross Margin
(RIO) Gross Margin
CHRW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.05B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 7.47B and revenue of 26.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

CHRW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 176.85M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 7.39B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

CHRW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 135.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in a net margin of 21.4%.