CHRW vs. NANC
CHRW (C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock, while NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive. Over the past 3 years, CHRW returned 28.46%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for NANC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRW vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's 7.19% return.
CHRW
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 93.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
NANC
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHRW vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 12.01% | 59.01% | 22.89% | -13.82% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 7.19% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRW and NANC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRW vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
CHRW
NANC
CHRW vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHRW | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 1.75 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 7.09 | +5.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHRW vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRW | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -20.94% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.07% | -12.21% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -20.94% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -3.41% | -6.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -2.67% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 3.02% | +4.68% |
Volatility
CHRW vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 5.88%. This indicates that CHRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRW | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 5.88% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.30% | 11.52% | +18.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.62% | 14.44% | +28.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.47% | 16.87% | +15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 16.87% | +12.09% |
Dividends
CHRW vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than NANC's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.55% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.47% | 1.93% | 2.17% | 2.57% | 2.24% | 2.03% | 2.38% | 2.53% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRW and NANC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRW has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to NANC (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRW dropped -44.54% vs NANC's -20.94%.
CHRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRW and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer