PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHRD vs. FSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHRD vs. FSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRD achieves a 54.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSM's -3.98% return.


CHRD

1D
1.91%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
54.63%
6M
49.52%
1Y
53.83%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*

FSM

1D
-4.07%
1M
2.17%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
41.02%
3Y*
39.37%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRD vs. FSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CHRD
Chord Energy Corp
54.63%-16.37%-24.26%31.74%34.13%260.89%19.55%
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
-3.98%128.67%11.14%2.93%-3.85%-52.67%28.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRD and FSM is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.19

The correlation between CHRD and FSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHRD:

$7.98B

FSM:

$3.13B

EPS

CHRD:

-$1.17

FSM:

$1.06

PS Ratio

CHRD:

1.51

FSM:

2.76

PB Ratio

CHRD:

0.99

FSM:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHRD:

$5.33B

FSM:

$1.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHRD:

$488.13M

FSM:

$598.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

CHRD:

$1.62B

FSM:

$743.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHRD vs. FSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRD
CHRD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CHRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FSM
FSM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRD vs. FSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHRDFSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.16

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.11

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

2.70

+2.11

CHRD vs. FSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the FSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRD and FSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHRDFSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.72

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.12

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.13

+0.97

Drawdowns

CHRD vs. FSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRD drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, smaller than the maximum FSM drawdown of -92.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRD and FSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHRDFSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.91%

-92.25%

+38.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.58%

-37.26%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.91%

-37.26%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.91%

-69.44%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.11%

-31.04%

+14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-45.18%

+28.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

15.23%

-4.01%

Volatility

CHRD vs. FSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) is 11.49%, while Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a volatility of 16.24%. This indicates that CHRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHRDFSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.49%

16.24%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.92%

44.21%

-15.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.76%

57.30%

-19.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.53%

57.27%

-17.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.20%

59.40%

-19.20%

Dividends

CHRD vs. FSM - Dividend Comparison

CHRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHRD
Chord Energy Corp
3.70%5.61%10.13%7.15%19.76%4.46%
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CHRD vs. FSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chord Energy Corp and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.67B
342.47M
(CHRD) Total Revenue
(FSM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHRD vs. FSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chord Energy Corp and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
61.9%
Portfolio components
CHRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a gross profit of 211.84M and revenue of 342.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

CHRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported an operating income of 333.22M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

FSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported an operating income of 182.18M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.2%.

CHRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a net income of 108.61M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

FSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a net income of 111.01M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in a net margin of 32.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHRD and FSM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSM has higher volatility (16.24%) compared to CHRD (11.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRD dropped -53.91% vs FSM's -92.25%.

CHRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHRD and FSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer