CHRD vs. ET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

CHRD vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHRD vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CHRD Chord Energy Corp	49.30%	-16.37%	-24.26%	31.74%	34.13%	260.89%	19.55%
ET Energy Transfer LP	17.51%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	1.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHRD : $7.78B ET : $69.42B
EPS CHRD : $7.73 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio CHRD : 17.72 ET : 13.90
PS Ratio CHRD : 1.61 ET : 0.82
PB Ratio CHRD : 0.96 ET : 1.42
Total Revenue (TTM) CHRD : $4.88B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHRD : $739.68M ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) CHRD : $1.63B ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRD achieves a 49.30% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 17.51% return.

CHRD

• 1D: -3.67%
• 1M: 22.13%
• YTD: 49.30%
• 6M: 39.78%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: 29.30%
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 29.13%
• 10Y*: 20.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHRD vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRD

CHRD Risk / Return Rank: 60
CHRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CHRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CHRD Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CHRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CHRD Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 53
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRD vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHRD	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.41	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.72	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	0.60	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	1.67	+0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHRD vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRD and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHRD	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	0.41	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	1.15	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.35	+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between CHRD and ET is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CHRD vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

CHRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than ET's 6.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHRD Chord Energy Corp	3.80%	5.61%	10.13%	7.15%	19.76%	4.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.97%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

CHRD vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRD drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRD and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHRD	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.91%	-87.81%	+33.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.75%	-17.33%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.91%	-25.82%	-28.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.01%	-3.30%	-15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.51%	-25.95%	+9.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.62%	6.24%	+7.38%

Volatility

CHRD vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that CHRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHRD	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.19%	5.02%	+6.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.78%	11.78%	+14.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.59%	23.83%	+19.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.60%	25.47%	+14.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.03%	36.63%	+3.40%

Financials

CHRD vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chord Energy Corp and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

CHRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported an operating income of 91.86M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

CHRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a net income of 482.47M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.