CHRD vs. ET
CHRD (Chord Energy Corp) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — CHRD in Oil & Gas E&P, ET in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 5 years, CHRD returned 20.14%/yr vs 21.98%/yr for ET. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CHRD vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRD achieves a 54.03% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 23.30% return.
CHRD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 54.03%
- 6M
- 47.67%
- 1Y
- 58.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.14%
- 10Y*
- —
ET
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
CHRD vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 54.03% | -16.37% | -24.26% | 31.74% | 34.13% | 260.89% | 19.55% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 23.30% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRD and ET is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CHRD and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CHRD:
$7.95B
ET:
$67.83B
CHRD:
-$1.17
ET:
$1.36
CHRD:
1.50
ET:
0.78
CHRD:
0.99
ET:
1.36
CHRD:
$5.33B
ET:
$89.38B
CHRD:
$488.13M
ET:
$20.48B
CHRD:
$1.62B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRD vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
CHRD
ET
CHRD vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.06 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 4.53 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.28 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.89 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.36 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
CHRD vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRD drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRD and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.91% | -87.81% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.58% | -10.02% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.91% | -24.56% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -25.82% | -28.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.44% | -3.78% | -12.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -25.75% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.22% | 4.55% | +6.67% |
Volatility
CHRD vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) has a higher volatility of 11.49% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.76%. This indicates that CHRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.49% | 5.76% | +5.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.80% | 11.78% | +17.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 16.26% | +21.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.53% | 24.87% | +14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.19% | 35.04% | +5.15% |
Dividends
CHRD vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CHRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than ET's 6.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 3.71% | 5.61% | 10.13% | 7.15% | 19.76% | 4.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.80% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Financials
CHRD vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chord Energy Corp and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHRD vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
CHRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
CHRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported an operating income of 333.22M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
CHRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a net income of 108.61M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRD and ET have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRD has higher volatility (11.49%) compared to ET (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRD dropped -53.91% vs ET's -87.81%.
CHRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRD and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer