CHRD vs. ET
CHRD (Chord Energy Corp) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — CHRD in Oil & Gas E&P, ET in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 5 years, CHRD returned 17.75%/yr vs 26.21%/yr for ET. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CHRD vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRD achieves a 42.90% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 27.83% return.
CHRD
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 30.96%
- YTD
- 42.90%
- 1Y
- 27.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.59%
ET
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 27.83%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 26.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $99.17M | $100.64M | $104.26M | |
| $207.76M | $185.88M | $185.05M |
CHRD vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 42.90% | -16.37% | -24.26% | 31.74% | 34.13% | 260.89% | 36.50% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 27.83% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRD and ET is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CHRD and ET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CHRD:
$7.32B
ET:
$69.99B
CHRD:
$14.90
ET:
$1.76
CHRD:
8.72
ET:
11.54
CHRD:
1.17
ET:
0.69
CHRD:
0.88
ET:
1.39
CHRD:
$6.32B
ET:
$104.47B
CHRD:
$316.34M
ET:
$25.19B
CHRD:
$2.30B
ET:
$14.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRD vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
CHRD
ET
CHRD vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.94 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 6.45 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHRD vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRD drawdown since its inception was -53.91%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRD and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.91% | -87.81% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.78% | -8.07% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.91% | -24.56% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -24.56% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.48% | -0.39% | -22.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.76% | -25.57% | +8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 3.67% | +8.46% |
Volatility
CHRD vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.44%. This indicates that CHRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRD | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.54% | 4.44% | +9.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.18% | 11.96% | +19.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.15% | 16.23% | +22.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.14% | 24.26% | +14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 34.14% | +6.60% |
Dividends
CHRD vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CHRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than ET's 6.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 4.00% | 5.61% | 10.13% | 7.15% | 19.76% | 4.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.56% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Financials
CHRD vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chord Energy Corp and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHRD vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
CHRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a gross profit of -370.39M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -17.1%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 7.40B and revenue of 34.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.6%.
CHRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported an operating income of 602.72M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 3.57B and revenue of 34.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
CHRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a net income of 525.19M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 2.53B and revenue of 34.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRD and ET have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRD has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to ET (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRD dropped -53.91% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRD and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer