CHPS vs. FSPTX
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and FSPTX (Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio) are both funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while FSPTX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. CHPS is passively managed, while FSPTX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS returned 54.34%/yr vs 35.38%/yr for FSPTX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FSPTX.
Performance
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 92.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSPTX's 34.65% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- 6M
- 72.81%
- YTD
- 92.17%
- 1Y
- 156.63%
- 3Y*
- 54.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSPTX
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 31.29%
- YTD
- 34.65%
- 1Y
- 53.09%
- 3Y*
- 35.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 26.65%
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 92.17% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 34.65% | 23.37% | 41.76% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and FSPTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CHPS and FSPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
FSPTX
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.35 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.85 | 3.87 | +4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.22 | 11.52 | +16.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and FSPTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -84.37% | +44.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.80% | -13.71% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.44% | -29.22% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.60% | -8.53% | -7.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -26.98% | +17.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 4.60% | +0.97% |
Volatility
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 21.97% compared to Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) at 10.86%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.97% | 10.86% | +11.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.59% | 20.65% | +16.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.83% | 24.93% | +17.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 27.94% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 26.24% | +10.21% |
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPTX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FSPTX's 8.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 8.06% | 9.06% | 9.42% | 0.01% | 3.95% | 11.62% | 18.86% | 1.86% | 23.77% | 8.32% | 1.54% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS and FSPTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (21.97%) compared to FSPTX (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs FSPTX's -84.37%.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and FSPTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer