CHK vs. PEP
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHK or PEP.
Key characteristics
| CHK | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.63% | 3.57% |
| 1Y Return | 13.28% | -6.23% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 33.10% | 9.61% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.48 | -0.36 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.22% | 16.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.69% | -40.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.59% | -8.35% |
Fundamentals
| CHK | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.04B | $241.39B |
| EPS | $16.92 | $6.64 |
| PE Ratio | 5.44 | 26.44 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.85 | 2.78 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.05B | $91.88B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.13B | $46.05B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.74B | $16.38B |
Correlation
The correlation between CHK and PEP is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CHK vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CHK achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's 3.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHK vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHK vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
CHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than PEP's 2.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHK Chesapeake Energy Corporation | 3.23% | 4.70% | 10.16% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 2.88% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% | 2.68% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
CHK vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHK drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHK and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHK vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CHK vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Energy Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities