CHK vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHK or FANG.
Key characteristics
| CHK | FANG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.59% | 29.59% |
| 1Y Return | 16.78% | 61.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 30.76% | 39.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.47 | 2.22 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.33% | 24.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.69% | -88.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.73% | -5.10% |
Fundamentals
| CHK | FANG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.04B | $37.05B |
| EPS | $16.92 | $17.35 |
| PE Ratio | 5.44 | 11.97 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.85 | 1.20 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.05B | $7.96B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.13B | $8.17B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.74B | $6.09B |
Correlation
The correlation between CHK and FANG is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CHK vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CHK achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 29.59% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHK vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHK vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
CHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than FANG's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHK Chesapeake Energy Corporation | 3.35% | 4.70% | 10.16% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4.11% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
CHK vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHK drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHK and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHK vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 5.28%. This indicates that CHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CHK vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities