PortfoliosLab logo
CHK vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CHK and FANG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CHK vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHK:

$10.70B

FANG:

$40.29B

EPS

CHK:

$3.03

FANG:

$16.08

PE Ratio

CHK:

26.88

FANG:

8.58

PEG Ratio

CHK:

1.85

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

CHK:

2.61

FANG:

3.26

PB Ratio

CHK:

2.01

FANG:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHK:

$514.00M

FANG:

$12.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHK:

-$199.00M

FANG:

$8.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHK:

$86.00M

FANG:

$8.98B

Returns By Period


CHK

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FANG

YTD

-15.24%

1M

11.96%

6M

-23.27%

1Y

-29.46%

5Y*

33.28%

10Y*

8.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHK vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHK is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHK is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHK is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHK is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHK is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHK is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHK vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CHK vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

CHK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
CHK
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
2.12%2.82%4.70%10.16%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.50%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%

Drawdowns

CHK vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

CHK vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

CHK vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
514.00M
4.05B
(CHK) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items