CHK vs. FANG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).

Performance

CHK vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHK vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHK Chesapeake Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	27.56%	-5.64%	-15.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHK : $19.58M FANG : $54.48B
EPS CHK : $7.57K FANG : $5.75
PE Ratio CHK : 0.01 FANG : 33.15
PS Ratio CHK : 0.00 FANG : 3.68
PB Ratio CHK : 0.00 FANG : 1.47
Total Revenue (TTM) CHK : $12.12B FANG : $14.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHK : $9.75B FANG : $7.48B
EBITDA (TTM) CHK : $5.26B FANG : $7.31B

Returns By Period

CHK

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FANG

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: 7.15%
• YTD: 27.56%
• 6M: 34.51%
• 1Y: 21.73%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 23.73%
• 10Y*: 12.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHK vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG

FANG Risk / Return Rank: 58
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHK vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHK	FANG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.46	—

Dividends

CHK vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

CHK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHK Chesapeake Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	2.12%	2.66%	5.06%	5.15%	6.55%	1.62%	3.10%	0.74%	0.40%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CHK	FANG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-88.72%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.72%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.57%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHK	FANG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	39.22%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	38.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	48.95%	—

Financials