CHIQ vs. BABA

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 45.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 4.89%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than BABA's 0.53% yield.

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.57%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 12.45%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.