PortfoliosLab logo
CHIE vs. JEPQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHIE and JEPQ is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

CHIE vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Energy ETF (CHIE) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-94.55%
47.44%
CHIE
JEPQ

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


CHIE

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

JEPQ

YTD

-6.90%

1M

-0.35%

6M

-2.76%

1Y

7.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHIE vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIE has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CHIE: current value is 0.66%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CHIE: 0.66%
Expense ratio chart for JEPQ: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
JEPQ: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHIE vs. JEPQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIE

JEPQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JEPQ is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JEPQ is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JEPQ is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JEPQ is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JEPQ is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JEPQ is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHIE vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Energy ETF (CHIE) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Calmar ratio for CHIE, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CHIE: 0.00
JEPQ: 0.45


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.00
0.44
CHIE
JEPQ

Dividends

CHIE vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

CHIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%.


TTM202420232022
CHIE
Global X MSCI China Energy ETF
0.00%99.98%9.46%0.00%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
11.29%9.65%10.02%9.44%

Drawdowns

CHIE vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-94.55%
-10.99%
CHIE
JEPQ

Volatility

CHIE vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Energy ETF (CHIE) is 0.00%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 14.72%. This indicates that CHIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril0
14.72%
CHIE
JEPQ