PortfoliosLab logo
CHIC vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHIC and SMH is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CHIC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


CHIC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMH

YTD

-7.75%

1M

13.86%

6M

-13.48%

1Y

0.49%

5Y*

27.69%

10Y*

24.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHIC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHIC vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIC

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHIC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CHIC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CHIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CHIC
Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF
0.00%100.68%1.70%0.22%0.26%1.49%0.53%0.24%2.20%4.53%0.63%0.34%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.48%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

CHIC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

CHIC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...