CHIC vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
CHIC and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIC is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Communication Services 10/50 Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both CHIC and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHIC or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between CHIC and SMH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CHIC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
CHIC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SMH
38.79%
-1.38%
-8.37%
40.07%
29.31%
27.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHIC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHIC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIC nor SMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIC Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF | 101.59% | 1.70% | 0.22% | 0.26% | 1.49% | 0.53% | 0.24% | 2.20% | 4.53% | 0.63% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
CHIC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
CHIC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) is 0.00%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that CHIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.