PortfoliosLab logo
CHF=X vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHF=X and GLD is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CHF=X vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USD/CHF (CHF=X) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHF=X:

-0.81

GLD:

2.39

Sortino Ratio

CHF=X:

-1.04

GLD:

3.30

Omega Ratio

CHF=X:

0.85

GLD:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

CHF=X:

-0.14

GLD:

5.33

Martin Ratio

CHF=X:

-1.68

GLD:

14.20

Ulcer Index

CHF=X:

4.53%

GLD:

3.05%

Daily Std Dev

CHF=X:

8.44%

GLD:

17.51%

Max Drawdown

CHF=X:

-60.32%

GLD:

-45.56%

Current Drawdown

CHF=X:

-54.38%

GLD:

-2.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHF=X achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 26.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CHF=X has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -0.92%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.


CHF=X

YTD

-8.40%

1M

0.90%

6M

-5.08%

1Y

-8.32%

5Y*

-2.85%

10Y*

-0.92%

GLD

YTD

26.73%

1M

4.96%

6M

23.75%

1Y

40.30%

5Y*

14.04%

10Y*

10.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHF=X vs. GLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHF=X
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHF=X is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHF=X is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHF=X is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHF=X is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHF=X is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHF=X is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHF=X vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USD/CHF (CHF=X) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CHF=X Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHF=X and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

CHF=X vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHF=X drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHF=X and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CHF=X vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USD/CHF (CHF=X) is 3.37%, while SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that CHF=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...